Established by early-career researchers with a shared research interest in history and philosophy of chemistry, Jargonium showcases short essays on chemistry and alchemy from the perspective of humanities. Our objective is to show that chemistry is a source of insight not only for those inherently curious about oxidation states, but for anyone with an interest in philosophy, history, art, sociology, or any other facet of humanistic inquiry. Together with our contributors, we show how looking at chemistry gives rise to reflections that often extend the chemical realm.
We would be more than happy to accept contributions from anyone interested in chemistry! If you wish to share with us your ideas, feel free to contact us at firstname.lastname@example.org
Who are we?
I am a historian and philosopher of chemistry studying nineteenth-century chemical (laboratory) practice and the ways in which experimentation, classification and analogy work together in chemists' reasoning.
My PhD (2023) at the Laboratoire Sphère (Université Paris-Cité, France) focused on the identification of chemical elements in practice between 1770 and 1870. Chemists agreed in theory that a substance was elementary when it could not be decomposed in the lab, but it was not always possible to apply this criterion in practice. Instead, I argued that they generally relied on a complex argumentation that integrated existing knowledge, experimental results and chemical similarities or 'analogies' among the substances that they studied.
I am currently a research and teaching associate at the Technische Universität Berlin, where I work on the project "Successful Failures: Analogy, Composition and the Many Lives of Ammonium in Chemical Practice".
I am interested in examining standard issues of the philosophy of science, from the novel and relatively unexplored perspective of chemistry. This includes questions such as: how does chemistry contribute to our understanding of the world around us?; what is the relation between chemistry and other sciences like physics and biology; and, do chemical entities and properties like molecules and chemical bonds, exist?
I am currently a Marie Curie postdoctoral fellow at the University of Athens, running my first own project called CReaCaL: Chemical Reactions as Causes and Laws. Previously, I was a post-doctoral research associate with the ERC project 'Metaphysical Unity of Science' (grant no. 771509) at the University of Bristol, and later with the NoMoS project at the University of Athens.
My undergraduate studies were in Chemical Engineering from the National Technical University of Athens. I then pursued an MSc in Philosophy of Science from the London School of Economics. I completed my PhD in Philosophy under the supervision of James Ladyman at the University of Bristol.
For more info on what I do, check out my personal website!
I'm a philosopher of science with a special interest in how values influence chemistry and climate modeling.
I’m currently working as a postdoctoral researcher in KTH Royal Institute of Technology. Prior to moving to Stockholm, I was a Ph.D. candidate at the Department of History and Philosophy of Science at University of Cambridge. In my doctoral research, I investigated the role of values in developing the periodic systems of chemical elements.
In my PhD monograph, I argued that examining the competing periodic systems with the framework of values gives us an especially insightful explanation of their differences. My thesis demonstrates how three chemists – Mendeleev, Julius Lothar Meyer, and John Newlands – emphasised different values when developing their systems in 1863-1875. While no chemist emphasised just one value, I argue that Newlands elevated simplicity (“simple relation”), Mendeleev completeness (polnost’), and Meyer carefulness when systematising the elements. I also identified a relationship between values guiding the development of the systems and chemists’ subsequent uses of their systems.